Director Robert Dill decided to conduct an experiment and film it in collaboration with a stunt team "EMC Monkeys" short film in the spirit Quentin Tarantino.
The main character is kidnapped by bandits, mistaking him for another person. They will soon pay for their mistake.
Starring: Robert Dill, Dan Wascombe, Malay Kim, Tommy Lan, Devin White, Paolo Ongkeko и Tim Park.
Lucky Strike
Source: YouTube
Home » Video »
Tags: EMC Monkeys, Lucky Strike, Devin White, Dan Wascombe, Quentin Tarantino, short film, Malay Kim, Robert Dill, Tommy Lan
Tags: EMC Monkeys, Lucky Strike, Devin White, Dan Wascombe, Quentin Tarantino, short film, Malay Kim, Robert Dill, Tommy Lan
The kids re-enacted the fight scene from Kill Bill:
youtu.be/I8DzHPoDJKs
youtu.be/zgdUuEsvx_E
If it hadn't appeared on this site, I wouldn't have watched it. It's complete bullshit.
Ravenside:
I agree with almost every word!!!
There is a carbon copy, and there is a reimagining. A carbon copy is “D-Day” with Porechenkov. Reimagined - "Nosferatu: Phantom of the Night" by Werner Herzog. The difference is fundamental. I’m not a Tarantino fan, but: he mixed the primary sources that Tarantino took in a completely unexpected and relaxed order. It was appropriate, almost not vulgar and almost not banal, as a rule, justified by the plot and was done for the sake of a certain audience effect, sometimes unnoticeably, it was ironic!! Tarantino never took himself seriously (in film). He knew what he wanted, but he didn’t put on the crown ahead of time, he didn’t give himself the main roles, unlike Nikit Sergeich, for example.
Ravenside:
Absolutely right. Receptions, not atmosphere. In fact, everyone copies each other. The question is how strong and competently, bringing in most of your vision. I don't see anything wrong with copying. The bad thing is that when copying, the creators do not have their own identity.
When you watch Quentin, you see a lot of interesting primary sources that are an order of magnitude better than the remake. + Tarantino is that thanks to him, we have not forgotten much that happened before in the world of cinema. It's valuable.
Well, there were references to “Kill Bill”... and such conversations before the possible murder of the victim - ala “Reservoir Dogs” or Julius’ monologue in “Pulp Fiction”... but it’s not that it’s a remake of a remake. And the fact is that it’s simply boring, dull, the creators copy the techniques, not the atmosphere... and even if the atmosphere... why is that necessary? Why do Raid style, Bourne style, Tarantino style... and Jackie Chan style, by the way? Smells like the Bruce Lee clones mentioned in another article. Rethinking ideas and experiences is the source of some progress. But the way we are doing it now is a dead end. It’s much more honest to simply write a plot (as fresh as possible, but even if not fresh, then at least self-sufficient), characters and shoot a short film that carries an idea - one, your atmosphere - two, your vision of the choreography of a fighting game - three.
I see absolutely nothing Tarantino. In which place? It “smells” a little like Rodriguez, and even then... by 1%.
In general, sometimes it amazes me when people say - Film like Tarantino. I have never heard more nonsense in my life. It's like saying - I'm doing a remake of a remake. And without even knowing what we are talking about.
Tarantino style... excuse me, what kind of crap...